![]() |

In this issue: · LRC judicial recommendations · 2008 Judicial Scorecard: LRC shines bright light on the Supreme Court · More bad reviews of LRC judicial recommendations Be sure to vote August 19 After a thorough interview/research process, the LRC has made recommendations for the upcoming judicial elections. Electing a person to public office is a duty and responsibility for voters. But unlike many other political races, often little is known about judicial candidates. It is for this reason the LRC has a long history of recommending judicial candidates who share the LRC mission to end lawsuit abuse. Be sure to vote in the August 19 primary because many judicial races will be decided in the primary rather than the general election. 2008 Judicial Scorecard LRC shines a bright light on the Supreme Court The fourth biennial review of Supreme Court decisions provides voters with an ongoing assessment of the trend in liability case rulings from our state’s highest court. The Washington Supreme Court, composed of nine elected justices, wields enormous influence over our daily lives yet most people know very little about the workings of the court system or even about the individuals who sit on the bench. The LRC’s 2008 Judicial Scorecard provides insight into the justices’ latest rulings on liability cases which provides the public with insight to those justices who share the LRC’s perspective on liability reform. Independent studies give poor marks
to
|
Our mission
•To limit expansion of tort liability
Our members
The LRC membership is a broad
coalition of
Stay informed
Sign up for the free LRC E-News, providing supporters of liability reform with quick, concise reports of the latest state and national liability information. To be added to the distribution list, e-mail LRC Executive Director Dana Childers. |